Pre-Fall 2026 Ph.D. Curriculum

Program Description

We have a thriving Ph.D. program with many full-time Ph.D. students hailing from all corners of the world. Most full-time Ph.D. students have scholarships that cover tuition and provide a monthly stipend. Admission is highly competitive. We seek creative, articulate students with undergraduate and master's degrees from top universities worldwide. Our current research strengths include data management and analysis, cybersecurity, computer games, visualization, web search, graphics, vision and image processing, and theoretical computer science.

This degree program offers interested students opportunities to do their research abroad, under the supervision of faculty at NYU Shanghai or NYU Abu Dhabi.

Urban Science Doctoral Track

The optional Urban Science Doctoral Track is specifically designed for students who want to focus on urban science through a cohesive array of in-class and experiential learning activities, while pursuing their Ph.D. at NYU Tandon. Doctoral track students will engage with CUSP’s urban science faculty, experts in methodological aspects pertaining to complexity (dynamical systems, multi-agent systems, network science, and risk engineering), informatics (AI, machine learning, and robotics), and sensing (Internet of Things, smart infrastructure, wireless).

Program Summary

To receive a Ph.D. in Computer Science at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering, a student must:

• satisfy a breadth course requirement, intended to ensure broad knowledge of computer science,
• satisfy a depth requirement, consisting of an oral qualifying exam presentation with a written report, to ensure the student’s ability to do research,
• submit a written dissertation proposal and make an oral presentation about the proposal,
• write a Ph.D. dissertation that must be approved by a dissertation guidance committee and present an oral dissertation defense, and
• satisfy all requirements for the Ph.D. degree, as described below including credit points, GPA, and time-to-degree requirements.

Upon entering the program, each student will be assigned a faculty adviser who will guide them in formulating an individual study plan directing their course choice for the first two years. The department will hold an annual Ph.D. Student Assessment Meeting, in which all Ph.D. students will be formally reviewed.

Program Requirements

The program requires the completion of 75 credits, comprised of the following:

GPA and Grade Requirements

The Computer Science Ph.D. has several specific GPA and grade requirements. Breadth Grade Requirement: A grade of B or higher is required in all courses used to fill the breadth requirement. Theory and Systems & Applications GPA: Students must earn a GPA of 3.5 or higher in the four courses used to fill the Theory and Systems & Applications course requirements above. Free Choice GPA: A GPA of 3.5 or higher must be earned in the two Free Choice courses. Cumulative GPA: An overall GPA of 3.0 or higher is required in all graduate courses taken.

Algorithms

Any student who has not taken a course in Algorithms prior to entering the Ph.D. program, at either the undergraduate or the graduate level, must take a graduate course in algorithms while in the Ph.D. program. Students may take Design and Analysis of Algorithms I (CS-GY 6033), Design and Analysis of Algorithms II (CS-GY 6043), or Honors Analysis of Algorithms (CSCI-GA 3520) to fulfill this requirement. The department may revise these options in the future depending on course offerings. Alternatively, students may petition the Ph.D. Committee (PHDC) Chair to use another course. The grade received in the course must be at least B.

Qualifying Exam

By the end of a student’s third semester in the program, at the latest, the student must be involved in a research project under the guidance of a faculty research adviser. It is the responsibility of each student to find a faculty research adviser and a research project, and to inform the PHDC Chair about their choice of adviser. Students must inform the PHDC Chair if they change their research adviser.

To satisfy the depth requirement, students must take a qualifying exam (QE) based on their research. The QE must be passed before the start of the student’s fifth semester in the program. Students are required to form a QE committee, select an exam topic, and a tentative date approved by the adviser and committee, by the end of their third semester.

Scheduling the QE less than two months before the start of the fifth semester is strongly discouraged. If a student does not pass the QE before the fifth semester, the student will not be allowed to continue the Ph.D. in the fifth semester, unless an exception is granted by the PHDC and the Office of Graduate Academics.

The QE committee must consist of the adviser and at least two other members. The committee must be approved by the adviser and the PHDC. The adviser is the designated chair of the committee. All members of the QE committee must be CSE faculty, faculty from other departments at NYU, or individuals of like standing from outside the university. At least two of the QE committee members must be tenured or tenure-track members of the CSE department, unless permission is obtained from the PHDC to include only one such member.

For the QE, the student must give an oral presentation of their research accomplishments to the QE committee and write a detailed document describing those accomplishments. The document must be submitted to the QE committee and the PHDC no later than one week before the oral presentation. A student is expected to have conducted original research by the time of the exam. This research may have been carried out independently or in collaboration with faculty, research staff, or other students. Students are encouraged, but not required, to have publication-worthy results by the time of the exam. It is not sufficient for a student to present a survey of previous work in an area or a re-implementation of algorithms, techniques, or systems developed by others.

The committee, by majority vote, gives a grade for the QE as either “Pass” or “Fail”. The chair of the QE committee will send this grade in writing to the student and to the PHDC Chair, together with a written evaluation of the student’s performance, approved by the QE committee members. A student who does not receive a “Pass” may request permission from the PHDC to retake the exam. The PHDC will consult with the QE committee, review the case and make the final decision as to whether a retake is allowed or not. A student may petition the PHDC to change one or more members of the QE committee, but approval of the request will be at the PHDC’s discretion.

If the request for a retake is approved, the QE committee will determine the date for the second attempt. If the student is not allowed to retake the exam, the student will not be allowed to continue in the Ph.D. program in the following semester. If the student does not pass the qualifying exam on the second attempt, or otherwise does not satisfy the conditions given to them upon failing the exam the first time, the student will not be allowed to continue in the Ph.D. program in the following semester. If a student has passed the QE and then changes their area of research, the student need not retake the QE.

Dissertation Proposal and Presentation

Within 6 months of passing the QE, each student is required to form a dissertation guidance committee. This committee must be approved by the student’s research adviser and by the PHDC. The committee must include at least four members, including the research adviser. The committee members can be CSE faculty, faculty from other departments at NYU, or individuals of like standing from outside the university. At least one member of the dissertation guidance committee must be a tenured or tenure-track CSE faculty member, and at least one member of the committee must be from outside the CSE department. The committee chairperson may or may not be the research adviser but must be a tenured or tenure-track faculty member in Tandon or have a cross-appointment of at least Associate level.

By the end of the student’s fifth semester in the program, the student and committee must set a tentative date for the dissertation proposal presentation. The presentation must be done prior to the start of the student’s seventh semester in the program.

Before finalizing the date of the presentation, the student must submit a written dissertation proposal to the dissertation guidance committee which should include:

• a description of the research topic
• an explanation of how the research will advance the state of the art, and
• a tentative research plan

After the dissertation guidance committee has approved the dissertation proposal, the student should schedule the dissertation proposal presentation and notify the PHDC Chair once this has been finalized. The presentation should be announced to the faculty by the PHDC Chair at least one week before it occurs. The presentation is open to all faculty. It may also be open to others at the discretion of the research adviser.

Substantial subsequent changes to the dissertation topic must be approved by the dissertation guidance committee.

Dissertation and Dissertation Defense

The last, and most substantial, aspect of the Ph.D. program is the dissertation. The research for the dissertation should be conducted in close consultation with the research adviser. When the adviser determines that the student is ready to defend the dissertation, a dissertation defense will be scheduled. For the defense, the student will give an oral presentation describing the dissertation research, which is open to the public. Following the oral presentation and an initial question and answer session, the dissertation committee and CSE faculty may ask the student further questions in a closed session.

Annual Ph.D. Student Assessment Meeting

All Ph.D. students will be formally reviewed each year in a Ph.D. Student Assessment Meeting. The review is conducted by the entire CSE faculty and includes at least the following items (in no particular order):

• All courses taken, grades received, and GPAs.
• Research productivity: publications, talks, software, systems, etc.
• Faculty input, especially from advisers and committee members.
• Student’s own input.
• Cumulative history of the student’s progress.

As a result of the review, each student will be placed in one of the following two categories, by vote of the faculty:

• In Good Standing: The student has performed well in the previous semester and may continue in the Ph.D. program for one more year, assuming satisfactory academic progress is maintained.
• Not in Good Standing: The student has not performed sufficiently well in the previous year. The consequences of not being in good standing will vary, and may include being placed on probation, losing funding, or not being allowed to continue in the Ph.D. program.

Following the review, students will receive formal letters which will inform them of their standing. The letters may also make specific recommendations to the student as to what will be expected of them in the following year. A copy of each student’s letter will be placed in the student’s file.

Upon successful completion of the program, graduates will have:

1. A broad knowledge of computer science.
2. The ability to conduct original research in computer science.
3. The ability to present their research in written papers and oral presentations.

NYU Policies

University-wide policies can be found on the New York University Policy pages.

Tandon Policies

Additional academic policies can be found on the Tandon academic policy page.